| 52 | 0 | 42 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
为了评估公路路域植被对施工碳排放的固碳潜力及抵消能力,研究基于路域植被数据构建固碳计算模型,选取树高、胸径、冠幅为主导特征因子,土壤有机碳与根系生物量为次要因子,结合Pearson相关性分析及样方调查与异速生长方程,估算公路两侧20 m范围内圆柏固碳量。结果显示:植被固碳能力受群落结构与多因子共同影响,其中特定规格树种(平均胸径>0.18 m、平均树高>6 m、平均冠幅>11 m)的固碳潜力更强。研究路段2 a建设期的累计固碳量为50.60 t/km,施工期第1年与第2年碳中和率分别为8%、5%,计算结果显示,需要32 a才能抵消工程碳排放,表明仅依靠路域绿化难以短期实现碳中和。研究可为公路路域植被固碳能力评估与低碳公路建设提供科学依据,并缩短碳补偿周期。
Abstract:A carbon sequestration calculation model was developed based on roadside vegetation data, using tree height, Diameter at Breast Height (DBH), and crown spread as primary characteristic factors, while soil organic carbon and root biomass served as secondary factors. Pearson's correlation analysis was conducted to examine the relationships between these characteristic factors and carbon stocks. By combining this analysis with field plot survey data and allometric growth equations, the carbon sequestration capacity of Juniperus chinensis within a 20-meter radius on either side of the road was estimated. The results indicate that the carbon sequestration capacity of vegetation is influenced by multiple factors, including community composition, tree species diversity, tree height, DBH, and crown spread. Specifically, trees with certain dimensions (DBH > 0.18 m, tree height > 6 m, crown spread > 11 m) demonstrated significantly greater carbon sequestration potential. Based on growth stages, the study sample was categorized into three groups: young, middle-aged, and mature stands. During the young stand stage, crown spread exhibited the strongest influence on carbon density; the middle-aged stage proved crucial for increasing carbon density, while the mature stage saw the highest levels of carbon stored per tree and total carbon storage. The optimal planting density was determined to be 0.25–0.33 trees/m2. Over the two-year construction period of the study section, the vegetation sequestered a cumulative total of 50.60 t/km, resulting in carbon neutrality rates of 8% and 5% in the first and second years, respectively. It is estimated that approximately 32 years will be needed to fully offset construction-related carbon emissions. By establishing a tiered planting system based on the varying carbon sequestration capabilities of different tree species and clearly quantifying engineering parameters, it has been demonstrated that prioritizing tree species with high carbon sequestration potential can enhance the overall carbon sequestration efficiency of the community. This approach not only improves the carbon sequestration efficiency of roadside vegetation but also mitigates the delayed carbon sequestration effect observed in young forests.
[1] 李素娟, 马奇飞, 叶芳. 中国碳中和潜力的区域差异及影响因素的时空异质性分析[J]. 环境科学, 2025, 46(7): 4075–4089.
[2] 李小冬, 朱辰. 我国建筑碳排放核算及影响因素研究综述[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2020, 20(1): 317–327.
[3] 高艳艳, 孙浩文, 王旭, 等. 高速公路建设期碳排放不确定性与降碳路径研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2025, 25(11): 4513–4523.
[4] Ai Kunpeng, Yan Xiangwu. Can green infrastructure investment reduce urban carbon emissions: empirical evidence from China[J]. Land, 2024, 13(2): 226.
[5] Lian Xihong, Jiao Limin, Liu Zejin, et al. A detection of street trees and green space: understanding contribution of urban trees to climate change mitigation[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2024, 102: 128561.
[6] Eldridge J D, Wilson R B. Carbon storage in soil and vegetation in paired roadside sites in the box woodlands of eastern Australia[J]. Australian Forestry, 2002, 65(4): 268–272.
[7] 李梦, 施拥军, 周国模, 等. 浙江省嘉兴市高速公路造林碳汇计量[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2014, 31(3): 329–335.
[8] 曹进, 贾珍珍, 杨艳刚, 等. 粤北地区高速公路服务区绿化树种筛选与固碳释氧效应评价[J]. 交通世界, 2017(Z1): 218–219.
[9] Fu Dafang, Bu Bei, Wu Jiaguo, et al. Investigation on the carbon sequestration capacity of vegetation along a heavy traffic load expressway[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2019, 241: 549–557.
[10] 齐韵涛, 高小虎, 李帅, 等. 高速公路边坡植被固碳机理及监测思路探讨[J]. 交通节能与环保, 2023, 19(1): 114–119.
[11] 侯文硕, 张瑶, 张颖, 等. 城市绿地固碳释氧效益对植物群落特征因子响应分析[J]. 风景园林, 2024, 31(6): 55–61.
[12] Hyong T S, Amah E V, Patricks E C. A critical evaluation of the carbon sequestration capacity of trees in specific regions within Kaduna State Nigeria[J]. Asian Journal of Environment & Ecology, 2024, 23(6): 30–41.
[13] 李士宣. 高速公路路域生态效率评价及生态修复体系研究[D]. 天津: 河北工业大学, 2020.
[14] 包含, 王耿, 晏长根, 等. 公路建设碳排放核算与岩土工程低碳措施及碳补偿研究综述[J]. 中国公路学报, 2025, 38(1): 46–72.
[15] 张子鸣, 郝珖存, 胡利文, 等. 华南地区边坡恢复生态系统固碳潜力分析[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2025, 23(3): 155–163.
[16] 钟文, 王让会. 基于机器学习–SHAP耦合模型的植被碳密度估测与未来预测[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2026, 26(5): 2031–2041.
[17] 陈涛, 李晓阳, 陈斌. 中国碳排放影响因素分解及峰值预测研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2024, 24(1): 396–406.
[18] 金都, 刘新平. 中国能源结构转型: 碳减排效应、驱动因素及碳达峰探索[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2024, 24(12): 4908–4916.
[19] Zhuang Qingwei, Shao Zhenfeng, Gong Jianya, et al. Modeling carbon storage in urban vegetation: progress, challenges, and opportunities[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2022, 114: 103058.
[20] Chang Jiahui, Shao Zhenfeng, Wang Jinyang, et al. Estimation of carbon sequestration capacity of urban green infrastructure by fusing multi-source remote sensing data[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2025, 141: 104643.
[21] 朱芩, 宁盼, 侯琳, 等. 三江源地区刺柏属植物群落类型特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2022, 46(1): 114–122.
[22] Kim J, Kang Y, Kim D, et al. Carbon storage and sequestration analysis by urban park grid using i-Tree Eco and Drone-based modeling[J]. Forests, 2024, 15(4): 683.
[23] 韦雪花, 王佳, 冯仲科. 北京市13个常见树种胸径估测研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2013, 35(5): 56–63.
[24] 崔潇, 张妞, 陈春艳, 等. 圆柏鳞形叶特征与叶面积估算模型[J]. 生态学报, 2025, 45(14): 6912–6922.
基本信息:
DOI:10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2026.0316
中图分类号:X173
引用信息:
[1]张鹏,张云飞,王烨,等.基于特征因子响应的公路路域植被固碳能力研究[J].安全与环境学报().DOI:10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2026.0316.
基金信息:
黑龙江省重点研发计划指导类项目(GZ2025077); 黑龙江省交通运输厅科技项目(HJK2025B011)
2026-08-27
2026-08-27
2026-08-27