| 5,149 | 181 | 549 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
氢能具有储运便捷、来源多样、洁净环保等突出优点,许多国家把发展氢能作为重要的能源战略。氢安全是氢能大规模商业化应用的重要保障。在分析国内外氢安全领域近年来最新研究进展的基础上,依次从氢泄漏与扩散、氢燃烧与爆炸、氢与金属材料相容性及氢风险评价等方面,系统总结了国内外氢安全研究面临的挑战,并对我国氢安全的发展提出了建议。
Abstract：The present paper is aimed at summarizing the research status-in-situ and the key challenges of the hydrogen safety in the hydrogen leakage and diffusion,the hydrogen combustion and explosion,the hydrogen and metallic material compatibility,in addition to the related hydrogen risk assessment. At the same time,the paper has also brought about some suggestions for hydrogen safety measures perfection at home in China so as to confine the hydrogen leakage into a properly controlled sphere.Thus,as a matter of fact,we have also traced and examined the effects of the hydrogen storage pressure,the diameter and the ventilation size,as well as the pressure relief device( PRD) on the pressure peak through experiments. In spite of this,there remain still lots of difficulties to be overcome through study of the complex physical properties of the liquid hydrogen by establishing and verifying the liquid hydrogen leakage model. The combustion regularity of hydrogen in the confined or semi-confined spaces,such as the garage,the tunnels and hydrogen refueling stations,should still be paid great attention,too. Besides,much attention has also been paid to the research of the mechanism of the flame acceleration( FA) and the deflagration-to-detonation transition( DDT) in the confined spaces by the scholars around the world today. Hence,the results of the above research prove that the interaction among the flame,the dominant shock wave and the reflected shock wave should be taken as the main factor to promote the said DDT. What is more,when the material is operated in a hydrogen environment for too long,it may also cause deterioration of the mechanical properties,known as the hydrogen environment embrittlement( HE). Actually,quite a few of tests we can conduct to make out the HE susceptibility of the metallic materials,including the slow strain rate tensile test,the fatigue life test,the fatigue crack growth test and the fracture toughness test. All the above said widely accepted testing methods can be adopted directly to confine the sample under the highpressure hydrogen environment. However,since there is no internationally uniformed hydrogen and material compatibility testing standard for the time being,it wouldn't be conducive to the sharing of the material testing data under the high-pressure hydrogen environment among the countries. All the above said risk assessments have become more and more urgent with the commercial application of the hydrogen refueling stations( HRS) and the hydrogen fuel cell vehicles( HFCV). Such risk assessment methods may include the fast risk ranking( FRR) and the quantitative risk assessment( QRA),the latter of which can not only be used for scientific evaluation of the risk of an accident,but also for the directly application to the formulation of the hydrogen safety distance standards. Besides,some researchers have also been carrying out the QRA studies to the hydrogen leakage accidents in different scenarios,to result in the corresponding QRA methods,though the development of QRA is inseparable from the support of the said software. Therefore,at present,SNL has launched a toolkit,HyRAM,specifically for the hydrogen risk assessment,though the effective data on the hydrogen system structure failure and leakage frequency remain under great need for further proof and rectification.
[1] WINTER C. Hydrogen energy—abundant, efficient,clean:a debate over the energy-system-of-change[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2009,34(14):S1-S52.
[2] ZHENG Jinyang(郑津洋)，LIU Yanlei(刘延雷)，XU Ping(徐平)，et al. Numerical simulation of obstacle influence on leakage and diffusion of hydrogen due to highpressure storage tank failure[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University:Engineering Science(浙江大学学报:工学版)，2008,42(12):2177-2180.
[3] XU Ping(徐平)，LIU Pengfei(刘鹏飞)，LIU Yanlei(刘延雷)，et al. Numerical simulation on the leakage and diffusion of hydrogen due to high pressured storage tank failure at different positions[J]. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities(高校化学工程学报)，2008,22(6):921-926.
[4] ZHENG Jinyang(郑津洋)，CUI Tiancheng(崔天成)，GU Chaohua(顾超华)，et al. Effects of high pressure hydrogen on mechanical properties of 6061 aluminum alloy[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics(高压物理学报)，2017,31(5):4-9.
[5] ZHENG Jinyang(郑津洋)，ZHOU Chilou(周池楼)，XU Ping(徐平)，et al. R&D of materials testing equipment in high-pressure hydrogen[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica(太阳能学报)，2013,34(8):1477-1483.
[6] LIU Yanlei(刘延雷)，ZHENG Jinyang(郑津洋)，WEI Xinhua(韦新华)，et al. Research on control of temperature rise in fast filling of composite high pressure hydrogen cylinders[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica(太阳能学报)，2012,33(9):1621-1627.
[7] ZHENG Jinyang(郑津洋)，BIE Haiyan(别海燕)，CHEN Honggang(陈虹港)，et al. Experiment and simulation study on bonfire test of high-pressure storage vessels[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica(太阳能学报)，2009,30(2):28-34.
[8] ZHENG Jinyang(郑津洋)，OU Kesheng(欧可升)，HUA Zhengli(花争立)，et al. Investigation on localized fire test method for on-board high-pressure hydrogen storage tanks[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica(太阳能学报)，2014,35(1):58-63.
[9] LI Jingyuan(李静媛)，ZHAO Yongzhi(赵永志)，ZHENG Jinyang(郑津洋)．Simulation and analysis on leakage and explosion of high pressure hydrogen in hydrogen refuel station[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University:Engineering Science(浙江大学学报:工学版)，2015,49(7):1389-1394.
[10] ZHENG Jinyang(郑津洋)，KAI Fangming(开方明)，LIU Zhongqiang(刘仲强)，et al. Risk assessment and control of high-pressure hydrogen equipment[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica(太阳能学报)，2006,27(11):1168-1174.
[11] ZHENG Jinyang(郑津洋)，ZHANG Junfeng(张俊峰)，CHEN Linxin(陈霖新)，et al. Research status-in-situ of hydrogen safety[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment(安全与环境学报)，2016,16(6):144-152.
[12] LI Xuefang(李雪芳)．Dispersion of unintended subsonic and supersonic hydrogen releases from hydrogen storage systems(储氢系统意外氢气泄漏和扩散研究)[D].Beijing:Tsinghua University,2015.
[13] RUGGLES A J,EKOTO I W. Ignitability and mixing of underexpanded hydrogen jets[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2012,37(22):17549-17560.
[14] TAKENO K,OKABAYASHI K,KOUCHI A,et al.Concentration fluctuation and ignition characteristics during atmospheric diffusion of hydrogen spouted from high pressure storage[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2017,42(22):15426-15434.
[15] OKABAYASHI K,TAGASHIRA K,KAWAZOE K,et al. Non-steady characteristics of dispersion and ignitability for high-pressurized hydrogen jet discharged from a pinhole[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2018,44(17):9071-9079.
[16] EWAN B,MOODIE K. Structure and velocity measurements in underexpanded jets[J]. Combustion Science and Technology,1986,45(5/6):275-288.
[17] HAN S H,CHANG D,KIM J S. Release characteristics of highly pressurized hydrogen through a small hole[J].International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2013,38(8):3503-3512.
[18] ANDREI V T. Knowledge gaps in hydrogen safety[R].Paris:International Energy Agency,2008.
[19] TANG X,DZIEMINSKA E,ASAHARA M,et al. Numerical investigation of a high pressure hydrogen jet of 82MPa with adaptive mesh refinement:concentration and velocity distributions[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2018,43(18):9094-9109.
[20] DE STEFANO M,ROCOURT X,SOCHET I,et al.Hydrogen dispersion in a closed environment[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2018,44(17):9031-9040.
[21] LI Yunhao(李云浩)，YU Yuan(喻源)，ZHANG Qingwu(张庆武)，et al. Numerical simulation for the hydrogen dispersion and distribution behaviors in the garage context[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment(安全与环境学报)，2017,17(5):1884-1889.
[22] LU Ming(卢明)，XU Ye(徐晔)，XIAO Xuezhang(肖学章)．Numerical simulation on the leakage and diffusion of hydrogen in indoor environment[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology(中国安全生产科学技术)，2011,7(8):29-33.
[23] VENETSANOS A G,ADAMS P,AZKARATE I,et al.On the use of hydrogen in confined spaces:Results from the internal project Ins Hyde[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2011,36(3):2693-2699.
[24] BRENNAN S,MOLKOV V. Pressure peaking phenomenon for indoor hydrogen releases[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2018,43(39):18530-18541.
[25] MAKAROV D,SHENTSOV V,KUZNETSOV M,et al.Pressure peaking phenomenon:model validation against unignited release and jet fire experiments[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2018,43(19):9454-9469.
[26] FUSTER B,HOUSSIN-AGBOMSON D,JALLAIS S,et al. Guidelines and recommendations for indoor use of fuel cells and hydrogen systems[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2017,42(11):7600-7607.
[27] WITCOFSKI R D,CHIRIVELLA J E. Experimental and analytical analyses of the mechanisms governing the dispersion of flammable clouds formed by liquid hydrogen spills[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,1984,9(5):425-435.
[28] STATHARAS J C,VENETSANOS A G,BARTZIS J G,et al. Analysis of data from spilling experiments performed with liquid hydrogen[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2000,77(1):57-75.
[29] VENETSANOS A G,PAPANIKOLAOU E,BARTZIS J G. The ADREA-HF CFD code for consequence assessment of hydrogen applications[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2010,35(8):3908-3918.
[30] HEDLEY D,HAWKSWORTH S J,RATTIGAN W,et al. Large scale passive ventilation trials of hydrogen[J].International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2014,39(35):20325-20330.
[31] JIN T,WU M,LIU Y,et al. CFD modeling and analysis of the influence factors of liquid hydrogen spills in open environment[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2017,42(1):732-739.
[32] SHAO X,PU L,LI Q,et al. Numerical investigation of flammable cloud on liquid hydrogen spill under various weather conditions[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2018,43(10):5249-5260.
[33] GIANNISSI S G,VENETSANOS A G. Study of key parameters in modeling liquid hydrogen release and dispersion in open environment[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2018,43(1):455-467.
[34] LIU Y,WEI J,LEI G,et al. Dilution of hazardous vapor cloud in liquid hydrogen spill process under different source conditions[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2018,43(15):7643-7651.
[35] JAKEL C,KELM S,REINECKE E A,et al. Validation strategy for CFD models describing safety-relevant scenarios including LH2/GH2release and the use of passive auto-catalytic recombiners[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2014,39(35):20371-20377.
[36] PRANKUL M,ICHARD M,ARNTZEN B J. Validation of CFD modelling of LH2spread and evaporation against large-scale spill experiments[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2011,36(3):2620-2627.
[37] HOUF W G,EVANS G H,SCHEFER R W. Analysis of jet flames and unignited jets from unintended releases of hydrogen[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2009,34(14):5961-5969.
[38] SCHEFER R W,HOUF W G,WILLIAMS T C,et al.Characterization of high-pressure,underexpanded hydrogen-jet flames[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2007,32(12):2081-2093.
[39] MOLKOV V,SAFFERS J. Hydrogen jet flames[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2013,38(19):8141-8158.
[40] MOGI T,HORIGUCHI S. Experimental study on the hazards of high-pressure hydrogen jet diffusion flames[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2009,22(1):45-51.
[41] FU Jiajia(付佳佳)，WANG Changjian(王昌建)，QIN Jun(秦俊)，et al. Large eddy simulation of hydrogen jet fire[J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology(燃烧科学与技术)，2013,19(5):473-477.
[42] BRENNAN S L,MAKAROV D V,MOLKOV V. LES of high pressure hydrogen jet fire[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2009, 22(3):353-359.
[43] CIRRONE D M C,MAKAROV D,MOLKOV V. Simulation of thermal hazards from hydrogen under-expanded jet fire[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2018,44(17):8886-8892.
[44] GRUNE J,SEMPERT K,HABERSTROH H,et al. Experimental investigation of hydrogen-air deflagrations and detonations in semi-confined flat layers[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2013,26(2):317-323.
[45] GROETHE M,MERILO E,COLTON J,et al. Largescale hydrogen deflagrations and detonations[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2007,32(13):2125-2133.
[46] GRUNE J,SEMPERT K,FRIEDRICH A,et al. Detonation wave propagation in semi-confined layers of hydrogen-air and hydrogen-oxygen mixtures[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(11):7589-7599.
[47] VOLLMER K G,ETTNER F,SATTELMAYER T. Deflagration-to-detonation transition in hydrogen/air mixtures with a concentration gradient[J]. Combustion Science and Technology,2012,184(10/11):1903-1915.
[48] WANG C J,WEN J X. Numerical simulation of flame acceleration and deflagration-to-detonation transition in hydrogen-air mixtures with concentration gradients[J].International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2017,42(11):7657-7663.
[49] ZHANG B. The influence of wall roughness on detonation limits in hydrogen-oxygen mixture[J]. Combustion and Flame,2016,169:333-339.
[50] ASTBURY G R,HAWKSWORTH S J. Spontaneous ignition of hydrogen leaks:a review of postulated mechanisms[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2007,32(13):2178-2185.
[51] POROWSKI R,WOJCIECH R,ANDRZEJ T. Analysis of mechanisms of hydrogen spontaneous ignition during its release into atmosphere[J]. Przemysl Chemiczny,2013,92(1):76-81.
[52] MOGI T,WADA Y,OGATA Y,et al. Self-ignition and flame propagation of high-pressure hydrogen jet during sudden discharge from a pipe[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2009,34(14):5810-5816.
[53] YAMADA E,KITABAYASHI N,HAYASHI A K,et al. Mechanism of high-pressure hydrogen auto-ignition when spouting into air[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2011,36(3):2560-2566.
[54] DUAN Q L,XIAO H H,GAO W,et al. Experimental investigation of spontaneous ignition and flame propagation at pressurized hydrogen release through tubes with varying cross-section[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2016,320:18-26.
[55] DUAN Q,ZHANG F,XIONG T,et al. Experimental study of spontaneous ignition and non-premixed turbulent combustion behavior following pressurized hydrogen release through a tube with local enlargement[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2017,49:814-821.
[56] DUAN Q L,XIAO H H,GAO W,et al. Experimental study on spontaneous ignition and flame propagation of high-pressure hydrogen release via a tube into air[J].Fuel,2016,181:811-819.
[57] ISO 11114-4:2017 Transportable gas cylinders—Compatibility of cylinder and valve materials with gas contents—Part 4:Test methods for selecting steels resistant to hydrogen embrittlement[S].
[58] ASME-BPVC-VIII-3:2017 Special requirements for vessels in hydrogen service[S].
[59] ANSI/CSA CHMC 1—2014 Test methods for evaluating material compatibility in compressed hydrogen applications-metals[S].
[60] ASTM G142—98(Reapproved 2016)Standard test method for determination of susceptibility of metals to embrittlement in hydrogen containing environments at high pressure,high temperature,or both[S].
[61] GB/T 34542. 2—2018 Storage and transportation system for gaseous hydrogen—Part 2:Test methods for evaluating metallic material compatibility in hydrogen atmosphere(氢气储存输送系统———第2部分:金属材料与氢环境相容性试验方法)[S].
[62] GB/T 34542. 3—2018 Storage and transportation system for gaseous hydrogen—Part 3:Test methods for determination of the susceptibility of metallic materials to hydrogen gas embrittlement(氢气储存输送系统———第3部分:金属材料氢脆敏感度试验方法)[S].
[63] ZHOU Chilou(周池楼)．Research on material mechanics properties testing equipment in 140 MPa high-pressure hydrogen environment(140 MPa高压氢气环境材料力学性能测试装置研究)[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University,2015.
[64] BARNOUSH A,VEHOFF H. Recent developments in the study of hydrogen embrittlement:hydrogen effect on dislocation nucleation[J]. Acta Materialia,2010,58(16):5274-5285.
[65] HUA Z,ZHANG X,ZHENG J,et al. Hydrogen-enhanced fatigue life analysis of Cr-Mo steel high-pressure vessels[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2017,42(16):12005-12014.
[66] AMARO R L,LONG B E,SLIFKA A J,et al. Application of a model of hydrogen-assisted fatigue crack growth in 4130 steel[C]//Materials performance in hydrogen environments:Proceeding of the International Hydrogen Conference 2016. New York:ASME Press,2017.
[67] ZHAI J,SHOU B,WANG H,et al. A hydrogen compatibility and suitability evaluation of the seamless steel tube 4130X[C]//Proceedings of ASME 2016 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. New York:American Society of Mechanical Engineers,2016.
[68] MICHLER T,SAN MARCHI C,NAUMANN J,et al.Hydrogen environment embrittlement of stable austenitic steels[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2012,37(21):16231-16246.
[69] BRIOTTET L,MORO I,LEMOINE P. Quantifying the hydrogen embrittlement of pipeline steels for safety considerations[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2012,37(22):17616-17623.
[70] NANNINGA N E,LEVY Y S,DREXLER E S,et al.Comparison of hydrogen embrittlement in three pipeline steels in high pressure gaseous hydrogen environments[J]. Corrosion Science,2012,59:1-9.
[71] HAN Yong(韩勇)，CHEN Xingyang(陈兴阳)，ZHOU Chengshuang(周成双)，et al. Design and application of database of the mechanical properties of metallic materials in extreme hydrogen environment[J]. Science&Technology Review(科技导报)，2016,34(8):89-95.
[72] EL-SHIMY M,AFANDI A N. Overview of Power-to-Hydrogen-to-Power(P2H2P)systems based on variable renewable sources[C]//Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical,Electronics, and Information Engineering. Guangzhou:Institute for Electrical and Electronics,2017.
[73] FRIEDRICH K,NOACK C,MICHALSKI J,et al. Power-to-hydrogen:technical and economic assessment[C]//Proceedings of World Hydrogen Energy Conference,Zaragoza,Spain. Miami,FL,USA:International Association for Hydrogen Energy,2016.
[74] ZHAO Yongzhi(赵永志)，ZHANG Xin(张鑫)，ZHENG Jinyang(郑津洋)，et al. Safety technology for pipeline transportation of hydrogen-natural gas mixtures[J]. Chemical Engineering&Machinery(化工机械)，2016,43(1):1-7.
[75] MENG Bo(蒙波)．Investigation on material property degradation and failure consequence of the high-pressure natural gas/hydrogen blends pipeline(含氢天然气高压输送管道材料性能劣化及失效后果研究)[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University,2016.
[76] MENG B,GU C,ZHANG L,et al. Hydrogen effects on X80 pipeline steel in high-pressure natural gas/hydrogen mixtures[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2017,42(11):7404-7412.
[77] LI Zhiyong(李志勇)，PAN Xiangmin(潘相敏)，MA Jianxin(马建新)．Quantitative assessment on hydrogen releases of hydrogen refueling station by consequence modeling[J]. Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science(同济大学学报:自然科学版)，2012,40(2):286-291.
[78] KIKUKAWA S,MITSUHASHI H,MIYAKE A. Risk assessment for liquid hydrogen fueling stations[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2009,34(2):1135-1141.
[79] DADASHZADEH M,KASHKAROV S,MAKAROV D,et al. Risk assessment methodology for onboard hydrogen storage[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2018,43(12):6462-6475.
[80] MIDDHA P,HANSEN O R. CFD simulation study to investigate the risk from hydrogen vehicles in tunnels[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2009,34(14):5875-5886.
[81] LI Zhiyong,PAN Xiangmin,MA Jianxin. Quantitative risk assessment on 2010 Expo hydrogen station[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2011,36(6):4079-4086.
[82] BARALDI D,MELIDEO D,KOTCHOURKO A,et al.Development of a model evaluation protocol for CFD analysis of hydrogen safety issues the SUSANA project[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2017,42(11):7633-7643.
[83] TOLIAS I C,GIANNISSI S G,VENETSANOS A G,et al. Best practice guidelines in numerical simulations and CFD benchmarking for hydrogen safety applications[J].International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2018,44(17):9050-9062.
[84] GROTH K M,HECHT E S. HyRAM:a methodology and toolkit for quantitative risk assessment of hydrogen systems[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2017,42(11):7485-7493.
[85] HANSEN O R,GAVELLI F,DAVIS S G,et al. Equivalent cloud methods used for explosion risk and consequence studies[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2013,26(3):511-527.
[86] MIDDHA P,HANSEN O R. Using computational fluid dynamics as a tool for hydrogen safety studies[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2009,22(3):295-302.
[87] MIDDHA P,HANSEN O R,STORVIK I E. Validation of CFD-model for hydrogen dispersion[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2009,22(6):1034-1038.
[88] MIDDHA P,HANSEN O R,GRUNE J,et al. CFD calculations of gas leak dispersion and subsequent gas explosions:validation against ignited impinging hydrogen jet experiments[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2010,179(1):84-94.
[89] MIDDHA P,ICHARD M,ARNTZEN B. Validation of CFD modelling of LH2 spread and evaporation against large-scale spill experiments[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2011,36(3):2620-2627.
[90] VYAZMINA E,JALLAIS S. Validation and recommendations for FLACS CFD and engineering approaches to model hydrogen vented explosions:effects of concentration,obstruction vent area and ignition position[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2016,41(33):15101-15109.
[91] ZHANG Zhichun(张志春)．Simulated calculation of hydrogen pipe leakage based on Phast 6. 7[J]. Electric Explosion Protection(电气防爆)，2015(3):31-32.
[92] ZHAO Boxin(赵博鑫)，ZHU Ming(朱明)，PENG Ying(彭莹)，et al. Simulation of leakage from hydrogen and natural gas pipelines based on PHAST[J]. Petrochemical Industry Technology(石化技术)，2017,24(5):48-50.
[93] LUTOSTANSKY E,CREITZ L,JUNG S,et al. Modeling of underground hydrogen pipelines[J]. Process Safety Progress,2013,32(2):212-216.
基本信息:
DOI：10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2019.0535
中图分类号:TQ116.2;TK91
引用信息:
[1]郑津洋,刘自亮,花争立,等.氢安全研究现状及面临的挑战[J].安全与环境学报,2020,20(01):106-115.DOI:10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2019.0535.
基金信息:
国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFF0215101)
2020-02-25
2020-02-25