nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 07, v.26 2586-2597
采煤工作面及回风巷流场影响下硫化氢分布规律研究
基金项目(Foundation): 华能集团总部科技项目(HNKJ23-H9); 河南省瓦斯地质与瓦斯治理重点实验室2023年度开放基金项目(WS2023B06)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2025.1163
发布时间: 2026-03-13
出版时间: 2026-03-13
网络发布时间: 2026-03-13
移动端阅读
摘要:

随着煤矿开采深度的增加,硫化氢(H_2S)异常涌出问题日益严重,其剧毒、易燃及腐蚀特性对井下人员安全和生产系统稳定性构成重大威胁。现有研究多集中于煤层尺度静态分析与简化扩散模型,致使H_2S扩散程度与实际工况存在较大偏差,有关考虑采煤机滚筒动态扰动的开采条件下H_2S运移规律有待深入。为此,以甘肃省新庄煤矿1802工作面为研究对象,通过开展多物理场耦合数值模拟,揭示采煤工作面及回风巷流场影响下H_2S分布规律。结果表明:回风巷内距内帮7~15 m范围为稳定涡流区,是H_2S积聚的高风险区域,其浓度可达主流区的3~5倍;采煤机移动导致的动态扰动使工作面流场压力前高后低,采煤机下风向因过流断面收缩形成局部加速区,其最大流速相较于进风风速提升了约90%;提出回风巷的流场分布分为四个典型区域:高速流区、低速流区、涡流区、边界层区,据此制定了基于流场分区的差异化防控策略,为深井煤矿H_2S灾害治理提供了新思路。

Abstract:

As coal mining progresses to greater depths, the issue of abnormal hydrogen sulfide(H_2S) emissions has intensified, posing significant threats to the safety of underground personnel and the stability of production due to H_2S's high toxicity, flammability, and corrosiveness. Existing studies have predominantly focused on static analyses at the coal seam scale and simplified diffusion models, resulting in considerable discrepancies between predicted H_2S diffusion patterns and actual mining conditions. The transport mechanisms of H_2S under dynamic mining disturbances—particularly those induced by shearer operations—remain insufficiently investigated. To address this gap, this study employs a coupled multi-physics numerical simulation approach, integrating fluid flow, gas transport, and mechanical disturbance effects, to systematically analyze H_2S dispersion behavior within a fully mechanized mining face and its connected return airway. The geometric model was constructed based on the 1802 working face of Xinzhuang Coal Mine in Gansu Province, with meshing refined in regions of high gradient flow. Simulations utilized the realizable k-ε turbulence model and species transport equations, with H_2S release sources calibrated according to empirical data. Boundary conditions incorporated ventilation velocity, wall roughness, and dynamic updates to simulate shearer movement. The results indicate that the airflow field in the return airway can be categorized into four distinct zones: high-speed flow, low-speed flow, vortex, and boundary layer regions. A stable vortex zone forms 7-15 m from the inner side of the return airway, identified as a high-risk area for H_2S accumulation, where concentrations reach 3-5 times those found in the mainstream zone. Within the working face, the shearer's obstruction creates higher pressure upstream and lower pressure downstream. Due to the contraction of the flow passage cross-section downstream of the shearer, a localized acceleration zone forms, increasing the maximum airflow velocity by approximately 40% compared to the intake airflow. This acceleration intensifies turbulent mixing, which subsequently affects H_2S dilution and transport. Based on the flow field structure and gas concentration distribution, a three-zone classification for H_2S risk is proposed, along with a differentiated prevention and control strategy tailored to the aerodynamic features of each zone. The methodology and findings provide a valuable reference for H_2S hazard management in deep, high-sulfur coal mines with similar geological and mining conditions.

参考文献

[1] 赵开功,李彦平.我国煤炭资源安全现状分析及发展研究[J].煤炭工程,2018,50(10):185-189.Zhao Kaigong,Li Yanping.Analysis and development suggestion for coal resources safety in China[J].Coal Engineering,2018,50(10):185-189.

[2] 康红普,徐刚,王彪谋,等.我国煤炭开采与岩层控制技术发展40 a及展望[J].采矿与岩层控制工程学报,2019,1(2):7-39.Kang Hongpu,Xu Gang,Wang Biaomou,et al.Forty years development and prospects of underground coal mining and strata control technologies in China[J].Journal of Mining and Strata Control Engineering,2019,1(2):7-39.

[3] 王云刚,崔春阳,张飞燕,等.2011—2020年我国较大及以上煤矿事故统计分析及研究[J].安全与环境学报,2023,23(9):3269-3276.Wang Yungang,Cui Chunyang,Zhang Feiyan,et al.Statistical analysis and research on major and above coal mine accidents in China from 2011 to 2020[J].Journal of Safety and Environment,2023,23(9):3269-3276.

[4] 付玉平,陈兆波,赵振保,等.煤矿安全事故的综合致因模型[J].安全与环境学报,2024,24(7):2731-2740.Fu Yuping,Chen Zhaobo,Zhao Zhenbao,et al.Comprehensive causation model of coal mine safety accidents[J].Journal of Safety and Environment,2024,24(7):2731-2740.

[5] 孙维吉,袁欣鹏,梁冰,等.煤层注NaHCO3溶液防治H2S方法及效果研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2016,26(1):104-108.Sun Weiji,Yuan Xinpeng,Liang Bing,et al.Injecting NaHCO3 solution into coal seam to control hydrogen sulfide:method and effects[J].China Safety Science Journal,2016,26(1):104-108.

[6] 蔡坤,宋远成,张晓贤.崔庄煤矿硫化氢综合治理技术研究及应用[J].煤矿现代化,2016(2):43-45.Cai Kun,Song Yuanwei,Zhang Xiaoxian.Research and application of comprehensive control technology for hydrogen sulfide in Cuizhuang coal mine[J].Coal Mine Modernization,2016(2):43-45.

[7] 胡夫.煤矿硫化氢治理关键影响因素的研究[J].煤矿安全,2014,45(5):23-26.Hu Fu.Study on influential factors of hydrogen sulfide treatment in coal mine[J].Safety in Coal Mines,2014,45(5):23-26.

[8] 张剑辉,邓奇根.煤矿H2S气体的危害、成因及防治[J].煤矿安全,2015,24(12):19-22.Zhang Jianhui,Deng Qigen.Hazards,genesis,and prevention of H2S gas in coal mines[J].Safety in Coal Mines,2015,24(12):19-22.

[9] Krouse H R,Viau C A,Eliuk L S,et al.Chemical and isotopic evidence of thermochemical sulphate reduction by light hydrocarbon gases in deep carbonate reservoirs[J].Nature,1988,333:415-419.

[10] Worden R H,Smalley P C.H2S-producing reactions in deep carbonate gas reservoirs:Khuff Formation,Abu Dhabi[J].Chemical Geology,1996,133:157-171.

[11] Worden R H,Smalley P C,Oxtoby N H.Gas souring by thermochemical sulfate reduction at 140 ℃[J].AAPG Bulletin-American Association of Petroleum Geologists,1995,79(6):854-863.

[12] Huang Liuke,Wu Yuliang,Fan Kaixiang,et al.Formation and transport mechanism of hydrogen sulfide in coal seam[J].Materials Science Forum,2016,863:149-153.

[13] 张广太.煤矿硫化氢赋存机理及治理研究[D].太原:太原理工大学,2007.Zhang Guangtai.Research on the occurrence mechanism and management of hydrogen sulfide in coal mines[D].Taiyuan:Taiyuan University of Technology,2007.

[14] 刘奎.喷洒吸收液治理煤矿H2S影响因素试验研究[J].煤矿安全,2016,47(2):29-32.Liu Kui.Experimental research on influence factors of spraying absorption liquid to control H2S in coal mine[J].Coal Mine Safety,2016,47(2):29-32.

[15] 刘奎.综放工作面硫化氢分布规律及治理技术研究[J].矿业安全与环保,2016,43(2):13-18.Liu Kui.Study on distribution law and control technology of H2S gas in fully mechanized caving face[J].Mining Safety & Environmental Protection,2016,43(2):13-18.

[16] 王坤.乌东煤矿北区硫化氢防治技术研究[J].中州煤炭,2015(11):49-51.Wang Kun.Research on H2S control technology of Wudong north coal mine[J].Zhongzhou Coal,2015(11):49-51.

[17] 贾牛骏,贾宝山,王洪达,等.综掘工作面硫化氢分布规律及其防治技术研究[J].煤炭科学技术,2018,46(12):158-163.Jia Niujun,Jia Baoshan,Wang Hongda,et al.Study on distribution law and prevent and control technology of hydrogen sulfide in fully-mechanized driving face[J].Coal Science and Technology,2018,46(12):158-163.

[18] 贾宝山,王洪达,贾牛骏.综掘工作面硫化氢运移规律及其防治技术[J].矿业安全与环保,2018,45(6):61-65.Jia Baoshan,Wang Hongda,Jia Niujun.Migration law and controlling technology for hydrogen sulfide in fully mechanized excavation face[J].Mining Safety & Environmental Protection,2018,45(6):61-65.

[19] 马尚权,惠永福,李丹丹.采煤工作面硫化氢涌出运移规律研究[J].华北科技学院学报,2019,16(5):18-24.Ma Shangquan,Hui Yongfu,Li Dandan.Study on the law of hydrogen sulfide emission and migration in coal mining face[J].Journal of North China Institute of Science and Technology,2019,16(5):18-24.

[20] 惠永福,李丹丹.掘进工作面硫化氢涌出运移规律研究及COMSOL数值解算[J].华北科技学院学报,2020,17(1):34-40.Hui Yongfu,Li Dandan.Research on hydrogen sulfide emission and transport law in heading face and COMSOL numerical solution[J].Journal of North China Institute of Science and Technology,2020,17(1):34-40.

[21] 刘小平.不同通风方式的煤矿巷道通风对比分析[J].机械管理开发,2017,32(9):6-7.Liu Xiaoping.Comparative analysis of coal mine roadway ventilation with different ventilation methods[J].Mechanical Management and Development,2017,32(9):6-7.

[22] 赵文华.煤矿巷道通风过程流场分布数值模拟[J].煤炭与化工,2017,40(4):74-75.Zhao Wenhua.Numerical simulation of flow field distribution in coal mine roadway ventilation process[J].Coal and Chemical Industry,2017,40(4):74-75.

[23] 姚春波.采掘面H2S涌出扩散分布时空演化规律与防治技术研究[D].太原:太原理工大学,2022.Yao Chunbo.Research on the spatiotemporal evolution law of diffusion distribution and control technology of H2S gushing from mining and excavating face[D].Taiyuan:Taiyuan University of Technology,2022.

[24] 惠永福.煤矿井下硫化氢危害评价指标体系研究[D].北京:华北科技学院,2020.Hui Yongfu.Study on the evaluation index system of hydrogen sulfide hazard in coal mine[D].Beijing:North China Institute of Science and Technology,2020.

[25] 荆德吉,赵勇,胡俭,等.综采工作面架间超声速喷雾降尘技术研究与应用[J].安全与环境学报,2025,25(10):3853-3863.Jing Deji,Zhao Yong,Hu Jian,et al.Research and application of supersonic spray dust suppression technology in fully mechanized mining faces[J].Journal of Safety and Environment,2025,25(10):3853-3863.

基本信息:

DOI:10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2025.1163

中图分类号:TD711

引用信息:

[1]刘阿建,刘扬,刘浩,等.采煤工作面及回风巷流场影响下硫化氢分布规律研究[J].安全与环境学报,2026,26(07):2586-2597.DOI:10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2025.1163.

基金信息:

华能集团总部科技项目(HNKJ23-H9); 河南省瓦斯地质与瓦斯治理重点实验室2023年度开放基金项目(WS2023B06)

发布时间:

2026-03-13

出版时间:

2026-03-13

网络发布时间:

2026-03-13

检 索 高级检索