| 42 | 0 | 20 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
为了解决船闸应急管理能力评价中指标体系主客观权重分配合理性不足、管理能力的不确定性难以定量表征等问题,研究建立一套科学可靠的应急管理能力评价模型,以为内河航运安全畅通运行提供技术支持。首先,基于“预防、预警、响应、恢复”4个维度,构建包含11个二级指标与31个三级指标的应急管理能力评价体系;其次,采用改进熵权法优化指标权重分配,组合应用灰色聚类与云模型,综合量化应急管理风险的随机性与模糊性;最后,通过结果对比实现应急管理能力等级的判定。在实例应用中,改进熵权法可揭示各指标间的重要性差异,并明确“应急处置与救援”与“预防与应急准备”为应急管理判定的主要驱动因素,两者权重合计超过60%;灰色聚类与云模型组合应用管理能力的等级评价,克服了单一方法在等级临界值判定中的局限性,实现了系统薄弱环节的精准识别。基于案例评价结果,研究提出针对两个船闸的“补短板–强核心”与“固优势–稳边界”的差异化应急能力提升策略,为内河船闸应急管理能力的精准化改善与应急资源优化配置提供了理论依据与实践参考。
Abstract:To address the significant issues of insufficient rationality in the subjective and objective weight allocation of the indicator system, as well as the challenges in accurately quantifying the uncertainty of management capability in evaluating ship lock emergency management capabilities, this study aims to establish a scientific, reliable, and practically applicable evaluation model for emergency management capabilities. This model provides robust technical support for the safe, efficient, and seamless operation of inland waterway transportation systems. Based on the four core dimensions of emergency management—namely "prevention, early warning, response, and recovery"—a comprehensive evaluation system was constructed, consisting of 11 secondary indicators and 31 tertiary indicators that cover all key aspects of ship lock emergency management. The improved entropy weight method was employed to optimize the allocation of indicator weights, reducing subjective biases. Additionally, the grey clustering method was integrated with the cloud model to comprehensively quantify the inherent randomness and fuzziness associated with emergency management risks. This approach allows for the scientific and accurate determination of emergency management capability levels through multi-method result comparison and verification. In the case application, the improved entropy weight method revealed significant differences in the importance of various evaluation indicators, highlighting that "emergency disposal and rescue" and "prevention and emergency preparedness" are the primary driving factors for emergency management evaluation, with their combined weight exceeding 60%. The combined use of the grey clustering method and the cloud model effectively overcame the limitations of single-method approaches in determining critical level values, allowing for precise identification of the system's weak links. Based on detailed case evaluation results, this study proposes targeted improvement strategies for emergency capabilities: "strengthening weak points and consolidating core competencies" and "stabilizing advantages and securing boundary capabilities" for two specific ship locks. These strategies provide a valuable theoretical foundation and practical operational guidance for the targeted enhancement of inland waterway ship lock emergency management capabilities and the rational optimization of emergency resource allocation.
[1] 刘亮. 筑牢长江航运安全屏障服务国家战略纵深推进[J]. 中国水运, 2025, 20(17): 1–3.
[2] 胡亚安, 安建峰, 李中华, 等. 现代运河发展与省水船闸通航水力安全调控[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2025, 23(5): 1–13.
[3] 黄耀倞, 许拴梅, 姜苗苗, 等. 基于博弈论组合赋权的航道水域通航安全评价[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2021, 21(6): 2430–2437.
[4] 刘明维, 王钟浩, 吴林键, 等.船闸浮式系船柱系缆安全监测方法研究[J]. 水运工程, 2023, 10(3): 85–91.
[5] 李嵘, 刘清, 王磊, 等. 基于SNA–BN的三峡船闸预约调度模式社会风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2025, 35(8): 148–155.
[6] 童炜程. 内河航运中船员安全意识与应急能力的研究[J]. 水上安全, 2025, 18(10): 34–36.
[7] 李晶晶, 张义军, 刘其禹, 等.闸室危险货物船舶事故应急能力评估模型及应用[J]. 工业安全与环保,2022, 48(11): 52–56.
[8] 杨锐. 某大型船闸工程深基坑开挖应急处置技术探讨[J]. 珠江水运, 2025, 20(11): 124–126.
[9] 杨阳, 张明进, 韩玉芳, 等. 内河航道设施智能化监测预警与信息服务关键技术研究[J]. 中国基础科学, 2021, 23(1): 26–33.
[10] 郑冰, 田序伟, 吴星, 等. 基于二维码的航道设施管养平台研发与应用[J]. 中国水运, 2023, 1(23): 45–48.
[11] 万军, 陈红生, 邱延林, 等.江西信江航运船闸运行中信息化应急管理策略[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2024, 55(增刊2): 876–880.
[12] 张程玮, 胡昊, 廖鹏,等.内河船闸运行应急管理评估云模型及应用[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2025, 23(1): 1–17.
[13] 涂晶, 李伟, 陈欣悦, 等. 基于模糊神经网络的路桥工程建设项目应急能力评价[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2020, 20(1): 412–416.
[14] 陈孝国, 肖修鸿, 杨悦, 等. 基于直觉模糊熵权法的应急物资储备库选址评价模型[J]. 价值工程, 2022, 41(15): 27–29.
[15] 孙慧芳, 陈杨, 毛文鑫. 基于改进灰色群决策的城市洪涝灾害应急管理效能评价[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2025, 35(9): 220–227.
[16] Zhang K, Liu J X, Wang Q R. Research on evaluation model of maritime search and rescue emergency management capabilities based on improved grey cloud model[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2018, 1087(5): 052010.
[17] 蒋伟, 韩跃峻, 顾岳峰, 等. 基于正态隶属云模型和灰色定权聚类的电力设备状态评估技术[J]. 电气自动化, 2025, 47(2): 82–86.
[18] 陈晓薇, 张希, 王增录, 等. 基于组合赋权-灰云模型的高速公路隧道施工安全韧性评估方法[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2024, 42(3): 158–166.
[19] 王全伟, 徐坤, 陈泽伟, 等. 改进熵权法–灰云模型在桥机起升机构安全评价中的应用[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2025, 25(6): 2104–2115.
[20] 曹烁, 李小波, 沈青, 等. 基于灰色聚类-正态云的地铁牵引系统健康状态综合评估[J]. 铁道机车车辆, 2025, 45(2): 164–170.
[21] 秦庭荣, 张小静, 罗平平, 等. 基于云模型的大雾中船舶靠泊作业风险评估[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2025, 35(9): 159–166.
基本信息:
DOI:10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2025.2153
中图分类号:U641.78
引用信息:
[1]杨娥.灰色聚类与云模型法在船闸应急管理能力评价中的应用[J].安全与环境学报().DOI:10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2025.2153.
基金信息:
广东省教育厅项目(2023KTSCX111); 广州市教育局项目(J202503038)
2026-10-10
2026-10-10
2026-10-10